Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of acronyms involving the word fuck

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Oleg Alexandrov 03:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

List of acronyms involving the word fuck
I'm not sure of the point of this list, but it seems to be mainly "think up a phrase containing the word fuck and list its first initial letters". --fvw *  05:13, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless. Jwissick 06:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Quite worthless, for only about five or so acronyms on it are real, and it is not needed. Oswax 06:45, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete CalJW 07:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - pointless. And someone spent so much time on this. CLW 08:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per effort put into article Anetode 10:08, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * DFD - The internal links in the See Also section give many firm examples of its legitimacy --220.238.130.44 10:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Fucking Delete I suppose? How about RTFM. Oswax 10:50, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Fucking where in the fucking manual does it fucking say you can't have a fucking list of of fucking acronyms involving the fucking word fuck?--220.238.130.44 12:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)


 * BFJAOFDN &hearts; purplefeltangel ( talk ) &hearts; ( contribs ) 11:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Utterly useless and unencyclopedic list. Carbonite | Talk 12:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Sophmoric at best, only of interest to those who confuse swearing with wit. Stu 13:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * F. Has anyone else wondered what the nominator's pseudonym might stand for, give its first letter? -Splash talk 14:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this article is FUBAR.Gateman1997 16:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Who the fuck thought up half of these acronyms? Sorry, couldn't resist. Karmafist 17:29, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, linked to from Fuck and too large to merge. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The link from Fuck is one of only three article links (the other two are Acronym and initialism and a list). Thus far, no one has proposed merging the article, so I don't believe its size is really relevant. Carbonite | Talk 17:52, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, SNAFU, no encyclopedic value. But I agree with User:220.238.130.44 .  Barno 19:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Carnildo 22:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as equinoctial listcruft. MCB 02:10, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Colloquial language is important... -- Geo Swan 05:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Then go write Wiktionary articles about it. This is not Slangopedia. / Peter Isotalo 03:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedical listcruft. Shauri 13:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Arbitrary list nonsense. / Peter Isotalo 03:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * DFD --58.104.8.215 02:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think this list could be useful. It would be helpful if there were such a thing as a sub-article for pages as these which are too large to merge with main article's like Fuck, however such a list seems to be relevant even if it referring to the acronyms of a derogatory word. Piecraft 14:46, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete useless listcruft. Groeck 16:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.