Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of actresses by year of birth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. See the categories X year births-- JForget 23:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

List of actresses by year of birth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A pointless list. Much better in categories. We aren't "Wikilists". – Aillema 14:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

We already have actor/actresses birth/deaths in Years in films e.g 1980 in film at the bottom. Far too generic -there are millions of "actresses". It should have been speedily deleted not afd  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 14:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I said on my talk page - I got some others' opinions, and I was told to AfD it. – Aillema 15:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Pointless list that is probably going to be very difficult to keep current. -- Blind  Eagle  talk ~ contribs  16:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete another endless list.Ridernyc 17:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this pointless crap.  Bur nt sau ce  22:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it would be unmaintainable if it had any more content than Dakota Fanning... DWaterson 23:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a bad idea for a list. Unencyclopedic. It would be extremely difficult to maintain, and what's the point to it anyway? Noroton 19:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. In this case, categories are going to do a better job of handling this information.  Every time.  RFerreira 20:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.