Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of affiliations of Rajat Gupta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

List of affiliations of Rajat Gupta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Does this information really need to be in a separate article? TOW talk  22:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Looking at Talk:Rajat_Gupta it appears there is/was already an ongoing discussion about this. I'm not sure AfD is the best place to be discussing it, especially when no actual deletion rationale has been put forward. RichardOSmith (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary duplication. No need to merge because the contents of this page were/are in the main Rajat Gupta page at Rajat_Gupta.  From that page's history, appears the author split this page from the main page because of edit warring with no consensus.  Many of the claimed affiliations are unsourced, poorly sourced or contentious. Discussion is already ongoing at Talk:Rajat_Gupta on how to deal with the list as part of the main article.  The separate article should be deleted. DocTree (talk) 03:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Swliv, Monstermike and I have gone back and forth about this forever. It's temporarily duplicated until we can figure out what to do -- there was no consensus between the three of us about whether it should be its own page or on Rajat Gupta's page. No deletion rationale has been put forward on this list, however. All of the affiliations are sourced and not contentious -- I have sourced every one -- please write on my talk page if you think anything's missing. Thanks! My [2011] ( talk ) &#124; 01:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly absurd overcoverage. This is an integral part of anyone's biography. The only such section which we frequently accept as a separate article is a bibliography/disocgraphy/filmography -- I'm pretty ambivalent about that, also, except for truly  famous creative people, and it would be a very bad mistake to let this sort of article split expand any further.  DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.