Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airlines using London Heathrow Airport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no real consensus, but this is one of those redirects that should have just been done. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

List of airlines using London Heathrow Airport
Listcruft, and seems to violate WP:NOT (indiscriminate collection). Furthermore, the information is totally redundant, since this exact list is available on the London Heathrow Airport article. That list also includes information on where the airlines fly. DB (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to London Heathrow Airport. Tarret 20:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect requires no admin intervention, just do it. Guy 22:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would just do it, but someone added a CSD and someone else removed it, indicating "controversy". DB (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The exact same list was never on the airports page in the first page, and the information on a list that was similar is now on the List of airlines using London Heathrow Airport article. The article deserves to be on its own, seperate from the Heathrow page, as it contains a lot of information, about a subject that is its own topic. I feel that the article is now no longer redundant, and dosent violate any aspects of the WP:NOT page. Greenboxed 00:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No it really isn't a separate topic. It is part of Heathrow Airport. DB (talk) 17:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to London Heathrow Airport, redundant list, LHR article has it all. --Ter e nce Ong (T 10:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not needed as a redirect. Vegaswikian 23:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and remove the list from the main Heathrow article. There is no point cluttering the main article which information such as this when it serves a much better purpose in a separate list.   DJR  ( T ) 14:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.