Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports of Markham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Any possible merit of the article notwithstanding, this blatantly violates the GFDL and common sense dictates removal. -- Kinu t /c  21:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

List of airports of Markham

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod was removed, so sending to AfD. I tagged it with a Prod tag because it is an unnecessary list of airports for a small regional town, and it is currently a content fork of the two respective articles. The creator had copied the text from the two pages and redirected both to the list page, but I undid that based on standard MoS issues while prod'ing. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 07:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree this list with two entries is unnecessary. Additionally, it's not a list, rather it's a combined article on the two airports. On the other hand, Markham is most definitely not a "small regional town". Read the lead of Markham, Ontario. :) — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a list, nothing more than a Fiji mermaid of the separate articles, which still exist. Whatever dispute led to this needs to be worked out.  Frankly this is silly. Drawn Some (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not a list just a copy of two other articles and probably a cut and paste GFDL violation as well. MilborneOne (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I'll admit my knowledge of the GFDL is not brilliant but I'm nearly certain this doesn't meet the terms of it as it's not properly attributed and therefore is a clear copyvio.  So tagged.  If it's not speedied as a copyvio I vote delete as it's totally redundant and two seperate articles makes a lor more sense. Dpmuk (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.