Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports serving all inhabited continents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

List of airports serving all inhabited continents

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short version: WP:OR. Long version: apart from aviation fansites/fora/blogs, I cannot find any (reliable) source that lists such airports, nor is it likely that there are serious sources for this. This seems to be a case of aviationcruft. - HyperGaruda (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC) Because the following page is about the same subject, I am also nominating:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both. There are no reliable sources that discuss airports with flights to all inhabited continents as a group (WP:LISTN). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Interesting, also in that there are so few.  But every interesting fact (or handful of facts) does not deserve an article.  Even if reliable sources had published this same information it would probably only rate a mention in International airport or whatever.Kitfoxxe (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete it's OR (no, Antarctica is NOT uninhabited...) and an unencyclopedic cross-characterization to boot. If someone wants to merge any of the content per Kitfoxxe, I would not be opposed to that, as the title isn't harmful and that would be the easiest way to comply with WP:CWW, but otherwise I don't even see a good reason for this to live on as a redirect. Jclemens (talk) 01:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete it is really trivia and not particularly notable. If any reliable sources mention it it might be worth an addition to the indiviudal airports but I doubt it is something that ever occured to anybody to report. MilborneOne (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOTTRIVIA. Ajf773 (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:LISTN, wow!, come on coola don't be like that ... sorry i can't resist, wheres the corresponding article List of airports not serving all inhabited continents? Coolabahapple (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all suggesting its own substantial convincing as an article, there's no signs this could ever actually be sufficiently and amply improved. SwisterTwister   talk  06:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.