Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

List of airports that able to offering regular flights by Airbus A380 aircraft

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is an indiscriminate list of airports that may (speculation) offer regular flights. The article has been renamed 12 times as it is not clear what is being listed, contested prod MilborneOne 20:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's going to end up being a list of the large international airports in the world. When the hype surrounding the 380 is done, this will seem overkill. Can anyone imagine a list of "airports that support the 747"?--Matt 20:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a directory. Arbitrary criteria, also.  O2  (息 ‧ 吹) 22:00, 06 November 2007 (GMT)
 * Delete Makes no more sense than List of airports that are able to offer regular flights by Boeing 737. Good call, nom. FCYTravis 22:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and everyone above. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 22:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsupported speculation. The list even includes Bradley International Airport near Hartford, CT; the runways aren't even long enough for an A380!  --Oakshade 23:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. V-train 23:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article hasn't been linked to from any serious article, its title is misleading and poorly worded. It's a joke. --Pete 00:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this nonsense. Doczilla 02:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jpatokal 02:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Airbus A380 is completely different than Boeing 747 like user Skyling do:, and this list offer that a airport can handle A380:enough length of runways, and bigger terminal ..etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cairned1234 (talk • contribs) 06:32, November 7, 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sure they are different aircraft, but if a B747 can use an airport, so can an A380. It's like having a list of streets that can handle a Mini and another list (of the same streets) that can handle a VW. BFD. --Pete 22:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - the list will inevitably become a list of most major airports, and some airports don't have sources backing up statements. I would also like to note that I was not the creator, as suggested on my talk page. However, I'm not sure whether that's just part of the template. Rudget Contributions 16:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.