Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of album covers containing nudity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

List of album covers containing nudity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Acollection of factoids for an arbitrary criterion. Poorly defined criterion (POV) Quite a few items in the list eg Take the Heat Off Me are hardly nudity. `'Míkka 23:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Any quibbling with content disputes can be fixed oneself or taken to the talk page. The fundamental concept of the article doesn't sound "arbitrary" or "poorly defined" to me, but this too can be fixed. wikipediatrix 23:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh yes it is quite arbitrary: List or album covers containing cars, List or album covers containing buildings, List or album covers containing American presidents List or book covers containing Lake Ontario..... Wikipedia is not a nondiscriminate collection of information `'Míkka 00:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I note these are not articles that have been previous deleted, but rather strawmen. Though iI do not think all such articles are appropriate, they are individually not indiscriminate, especially if limited to albums considered notable in WP. The presence of nudity of an album cover is arguably more important and sometimes controversial. DGG (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that this is a reasonable argument. On the other hand, if it is a notable topic and if you have reliable sources which discuss the issue of nudity on lbum covers, then there must be an article in wikipedia, and this list will be a valid "sibling article", and I will change my vote. `'Míkka 18:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOR as none of the entries have sources.-- Sef rin gle Talk 03:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 04:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete This might be improved with a description here or there, but at the moment, it's simply a list of albums that may or may not have some or a lot of rear or full frontal, etc etc. Mandsford 22:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete; rather unsourced (and hard to source) and what, exactly, constitutes "nudity" is arguable. Would, for instance, Nevermind qualify?  (I see it's on the list now.  I would argue it shouldn't be since it hardly fits what most people think of when they say "cover with nudity).  &mdash; Coren (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC) edited 02:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - what is the point of a random and utterly trivial collection of information like this? Delete as per Mikka. Gatoclass 14:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As pure original research. There are no sources provided to show that people actually write about this. Spellcast 07:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.