Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of albums which include 9 or more tracks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Nandesuka 14:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

List of albums which include 9 or more tracks
Serves no useful purpose and is apparently misnamed anyways. The ARK 05:31, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Misnamed, misconceived. Chris the speller 05:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another song list? Get rid of this shit, and block the user who's making it. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
 * Delete. Absolutely pointless list. And stop bringing us lists of music sorted by all kinds of meaningless criteria. This is right up there with List of songs with an adverb in the title and List of songs with a fraction or non-integer in the title. &#9678;DanMS 06:28, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Metropolitan90 06:37, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Songs with nine letters in the title.  Songs with the word "of" in the title.  Where will it end?  List of all songs with or without titles!  Laszlo Panaflex 07:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete if it was "list of albums which include 24 or more tracks" then we might have a useable list - because there aren't many of them. But 9 or more?  9 or less?  9 is the average number.  Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 10:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsensical unencyclopedic crap. Tagged for that purpose. --YixilTesiphon 13:14, 3 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.