Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alleged UFO crashes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW and for the consensus met to keep the article as a redundant with category is never a delete rationale per WP:CLN. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy  ( talk ) 09:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

List of alleged UFO crashes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article, which documents 11 incidents, is redundant to Category:UFO crashes.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  23:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom . Keep per WP:CLN. John Sloan (talk) 20:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Keep Change vote after reading WP:CLN. Cheers Cosmic Latte.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per WP:CLN. Lists are meant to complement categories. Cosmic Latte (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It could very well be merged with a general UFO article but these list type articles are all over the place. Keep for now.Morgonio (talk) 05:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Redundant with category is never a delete rationale, per WP:CLN. AndyJones (talk) 20:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Per AndyJones. List would be significantly improved if a short description was attached to each list item.--Mike Cline (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - This AfD should probably be closed now, per WP:SNOW. John Sloan (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.