Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ambassadors of Malaysia to East Timor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone would like the article userfied, let me know Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:42, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

List of ambassadors of Malaysia to East Timor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Listcruft TheLongTone (talk) 14:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment See List of ambassadors of China to East Timor, List of ambassadors of the United States to East Timor and List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to East Timor. Do you consider these three articles as WP:LISTCRUFT? Panji Keramat (talk) 14:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I most certainly do. See WP:OTHERSTUFFTheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Malaysia has a resident ambassador to East Timor. Does meet WP:LISTN. Panji Keramat (talk) 14:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You mean a list is ipso facto notable because it has content? I'm writing list of pimples on my curvy pink butt as I speak.TheLongTone (talk) 13:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 12:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I don't see a deletion rationale, just a WP:VAGUEWAVE to a grab-bag essay that offers no helpful or specific guidance. East Timor–Malaysia relations is an obvious merge target, so even if it were decided not to maintain a standalone list there is an obvious place for this verifiable and relevant information to go. The closer can read that as a "keep per WP:ATD" if they like. postdlf (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to East Timor–Malaysia relations. We don't need a standalone list to list 4 names. No WP:LISTN coverage in WP:RS has been presented. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Still no consensus

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  14:52, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject isn't notable. The list contains only red-links to NN entries. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that the people on the list are notable, and as such there's no purpose served by having a list of them. Furthermore, even if the entries were worthwhile information, there is certainly not enough of it to justify a standalone article. Vanamonde (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.