Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of animated television series of 2022


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

List of animated television series of 2022

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is entirely WP:CRYSTAL. TV series get delayed all the time and there is no guarantee that any of these will air a year and a half from now. See Covid19 for one of those reasons. This article also provides no value at all for a reader with mostly TBA table entries. Move to draft and keep it there until 2022. Gonnym (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Gonnym (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete 7/8 are press releases rewritten by the same person (and full of WP:JARGON no normal person can interpret), the one that isn't is a Patch article which comes down to 'I talked to my neighbor Bob on Facebook and he says he's got a Netflix series, which is swell!'. Half the projects don't have a network, and yup...COVID. Wait until things are announced by their respective networks as in production, and are sourced to more than one site and a neighbor. No draftifying either because of the one-sourcing.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously without prejudice against recreation sometime in mid to late 2021 when there's firmer information and better sources than this. Even List of animated television series of 2021 didn't exist until about four months ago — so there's no serious reason why we would already need to jump this far ahead of any reliably sourced facts about the next year after that. (Also, that Patch source may be the fucking funniest thing I've ever read, and I don't mean that in a good way: expected to premiere on Netflix in 2022, when the dude hasn't even pitched the damn thing yet, and my eight year old niece can draw better than the "sample" cel that's being used to illustrate the story? Good luck, animator dude!) Bearcat (talk) 03:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I didn't want to comment on the 'quality' of the sketch on Patch, but if this is headed to Netflix in 2022...I expect Ted Sarandos will be 5150'ed and everyone to sell their stock. I'm removing that one, because apparently that 'reporter' needs to really improve their Patch password and their kid used their account to post this.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, my stars, that left me speechless. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Userfy - This page will have to get recreated eventually, so we should keep a draft of it for when it is needed. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment This is sourced to one website and one writer. No, it shouldn't be userfied because this is both incomplete and terribly researched, and the creating user has a whole bunch of copyvio notices, so they cannot be trusted to be a steward of this page.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Then instead of moving it to the userspace, move it to the draftspace. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment As said above, you just copy a previous list-of template, then work off that. I'd rather a fresh start when we have notable shows than keeping this as-is.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Very well. I have struck my !vote under those grounds. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Very little effort is involved in creating a table like this, and the sources currently provided are unlikely to be used in the eventual article. I don't see any point to preserving this in draft or user space. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Honestly, having looked at this article, couldn't it be Speedy Deleted under G11? Foxnpichu (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: As nom, I have no problem with it being deleted. --Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. WP:CRYSTAL A list about 2022 may be overly optimistic considering 2020.   // Timothy ::  talk  12:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Ha! Good point! Foxnpichu (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. desmay (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.