Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of applications with iCalendar support


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  10:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

List of applications with iCalendar support

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This list is entirely unreferenced, and seems too trivial for a standalone per WP:LISTCRITERIA. iCalendar support is very common, and the list is also not very useful as it mixes many types of software with different purposes together. the wub "?!"  22:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. the wub  "?!"  22:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom; also see WP:SALAT. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 23:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as an almost textbook example of failing multiple points of WP:NOT, including NOTHOWTO (Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers,) WP:NOTDIRECTORY (An article should not include product pricing or availability information (which can vary widely with time and location) unless there is an independent source and encyclopedic significance for the mention; and NOTDATABASE (To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.