Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atonal pieces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep in some form. Shimeru 02:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

List of atonal pieces

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article currently is not a list of atonal pieces. It is instead a list of the names of 13 out of literally tens of thousands of composers who have written atonal pieces. For this reason the article is potentially infinite. Also the article seems to be contradictory with other “Technique” articles. For instance all pieces listed in the List of twelve-tone pieces would also need to be listed here because twelve-tone music can be looked at as a sub form of atonal music. At the very least it should be renamed with a more selective title and then rewritten. S.dedalus 23:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as per my coments. S.dedalus 05:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename, revise, cite. Hyacinth 09:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but rename and expand. There's room for a list of "notable" composers who've used atonal techniques, or famous atonal pieces. Right now this article leans towards the former. &mdash;vivacissamamente 22:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per vivacissamamente - famous atonal composers? - v.difficult to get a good name for it, sbandrews (t) 18:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Rename &rarr; List of composers of atonal music &mdash; Rebuild from content of atonality. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.