Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Porncruft. Negligible independent reliable sourcing. Most articles of this type havw already been deleted, recognizing that porn industry awards are generally marketing devices handed out by promotional businesses to promote their advertisers or clients. What little substantive text there is in the article was cut-and-pasted from the subject's BLP without proper attribution. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge and redirect – All awards, in any industry, meet OP's characterization. The items listed are notable awards with articles: AVN Award, NightMoves Award, XBIZ Awards and XRCO Award. It also appears all the information is cited. We do not require secondary sources for industry awards such as 71st Primetime Emmy Awards. Why would we suddenly now require secondary sources for this particular industry? --- Coffee  and crumbs  22:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons laid out by the nom. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Coffee. If there isn't anything worth merging, then just delete. Rockphed (talk) 13:37, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
 * Delete: does not meet WP:LISTN for lack of secondary coverage. Nothing to merge, so it's a 'delete' for me. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - The fact Ryan's page can display the lists without effecting that article, there doesn't seem to be any need to merge.TenderKing (talk) 12:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LISTN. --qedk (t 桜 c) 18:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge per coffee. Recently depreciated pornbio does not necessitate the deletion of a highly awarded porn actor. WP:ANYBIO could apply. Lightburst (talk) 01:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Porn awards tend to be industry self-promotional fluff, and this list is no exception. As for Coffeeandcrumbs' argument, the Primetime Emmy Awards example gets plenty of secondary coverage, undermining the editor's argument. PORNBIO was taken down because, without reliable sources, all that's left is self-promotion and the porn itself. Also porn award's having a Wikipedia article stopped conferring notability to its winners many years ago. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap and prevent recreation. If someone reverts the redirect, we have BRD and BLOCKs to deal with it. --- Coffee  and crumbs  03:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.