Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Tom Petty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Tom Petty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short awards list with one reference, PROD reverted. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, obviously substantial enough to merit a split; the nomination's description of it as "short" is just bizarre. And the number of references currently in the article is irrelevant, that obviously can be improved for any notable awards (and the year, name, and provider of a notable award is arguably sourcing in and of itself). postdlf (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see an issue with the article size; a split seems reasonable given the length of Tom Petty's article. In regards to references, they can be improved as desired. For example, I added Grammy.com, BillboardMusicAwards.com, and a recent Washington Post article that goes into detail about some of Petty's MTV Music Award nominations.  gongshow  talk  05:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The length of the original article plus this article seem to warrant a split. Thus, this article should be kept and not merged. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  12:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - seems to be enough here to justify a separate article. Metamagician3000 (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.