Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards received by Karan Mehra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

List of awards received by Karan Mehra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnecessary WP:CFORKs. The creator has created various such articles. Am clubbing them all here in one AfD. Clearly not here to help encyclopedia. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with the nominator that these are unnecessary content forking. Delete all these lists.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete- Agree with the nominator that the lists are unnecessary content forking. Whout warrants in the maximum probability a lone section, cannot be gifted an article.  Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 10:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete after performing any necessary content merges. For all but two of the pages there is no compelling rationale for a fork or split. The Ye Hai Mohabbatein and Kumkum Bhagya pages are around 40kB each (not including the broken off lists of awards that now reside at List of accolades received by Ye Hai Mohabbatein and List of accolades received by Kumkum Bhagya), so someone could theoretically make a WP:SIZESPLIT argument for their respective accolades pages, but I think that argument would be tenuous. WP:SIZESPLIT says that at 40 kB and below a split would generally only be justified based on content issues, and I don't see any pressing content issues here that would require splitting. So I think it's easiest to keep all the content together. /wiae /tlk  16:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.