Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bald people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 06:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of bald people
Non-encyclopediac material. Does not belong on Wikipedia. Also, there are numerous bald people that will never be listed here. --Ineffable3000 05:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as nom. --Ineffable3000 05:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Where will this end- famous fat people? Famous people who wore glasses? Famous people who prefered not to eat red meat on a Sunday? WJBscribe 05:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unmaintainable, arbitary, useless, indiscriminate listcruft. MER-C 07:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - if the article on baldness is to be believed, baldness affects about 60% of men at some point. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--Nydas (Talk) 12:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - way too broad a topic. 23skidoo 13:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft, there are so many bald people in this world, it is never ending. Ter e nce Ong 13:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedic. TSO1D 14:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - wikipedia is not a repository for trivia -- Whpq 17:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete far too unreasonable and unuseful of a list scope.-- danntm T C 17:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Detete Maybe not the best idea of an article. Probably better as a cat. Dark j  e  di requiem  20:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteA wholly non-encyclopedic article.--Anthony.bradbury 23:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unencylopedic, indiscriminate, little informational value as a list. Black Falcon 00:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or possibly merge into bald? I dunno.  It has no value as a list, I agree.--Dmz5 06:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 16:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom - Baldness might I suppose list a few people especially notable for being bald, vs just recording the fact of their baldness but the list will be very short. This list of anyone who is bald in unencyclopaedic. David Ruben Talk 18:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleteper above. NeoJustin 22:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Spangineerws (háblame)  05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Dahn 05:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.