Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bands with numbers in the title


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

List of bands with numbers in the title
Utterly pointless and unencyclopaedic. Survived an AfD last year here though no substantive arguments for keeping were produced. BlueValour 18:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Note This page was not listed on AFD until the 16th August. --Tagishsimon (talk)


 * merge with List of band names that contain numbers and keep. It's harmless enough and might provide someone somewhere with a crossword puzzle answer. There's no other article desperate for the namespace, and the list is long enough to be credible. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge per Tagishsimon above. --Daniel Olsen 20:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete This article is yet another bloody smeggy list and as all the lists I have found seems to be in violation of both No original research and What Wikipedia is not. The article has a very brief one sentence introduction. Also I really do not see how this article can ever be verified as either complete or accurate. It may be better if it were a category. I have also nominated List of band names that contain numbers for deletion. Displaced Brit 20:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Namespace usage isn't typically the motivating factor for AfD's, and practically any entry is vaguely useful in the context of things like crossword puzzles. Icewolf34 20:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete both - neither list is encyclopaedic; so there is numbers in the title or band name; so what? It means nothing; this is listing for the sake of listing; the fact that it 'is harmless' doesn't justify its presence in a serious encyclopaedia. If I produced a List of places with an e in the name it would also be harmless but just as totally pointless. BlueValour 21:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, list cruft. Non-encyclopedic. Who'd look this up? Plus it's unmanageable. Spearhead 21:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as per above will381796 22:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nintendude list. Danny Lilithborne 23:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. -- Koffieyahoo 01:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I am dumbstruck by the pointlessness of this. --Xrblsnggt 03:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge per Tagishsimon's (top). Anthony 12:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Rainy day trivia, not an encyclopedia article. Piccadilly 17:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sub-trivial. KleenupKrew 03:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.