Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling music artists (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep as per guidelines. Capitalistroadster 19:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists
This list is stupid it is just made up and Michaeld Jackson is the best but he is not top. I think it is not npov and it should be removed MoTo 14:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Here are links to earlier nominations:
 * Articles for deletion/List of best-selling music artists
 * Articles for deletion/List of best-selling music artists 2
 * --Lambiam Talk 14:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep --MoTwo 14:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep -- well-sourced, quantified. I don't see the problem. 23skidoo 14:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Does anyone else realize the person who listed this is blocked forever? So keep. I love patrolling it and-despite what a lot of people say-it is a very well researched and sourced page. --69.145.123.171 16:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Caldorwards4 18:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Nothing wrong with this article at all. 81.170.50.197 18:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Seems like a bad faith nom. &mdash; RJH (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously a bad faith nom by a now banned user. Peyna 19:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Peyna --Robdurbar 19:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Peyna and 23skidoo. -Mtmelendez 19:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.