Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of blogging terms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Cool Hand Luke 01:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

List of blogging terms

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Listcruft. Lots of uncommon blogs and I doubt this is encyclopedic. Disclaimer: I am a blogger Computerjoe 's talk 14:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with "blog", or rather integrate the material; it doesn't need to be in list form. (I note that bluelink "Vorage" redirects to "Blog", but "Blog" contains no mention of the term.)RandomCritic 16:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The article actually was originally part of blog but was split up. Computerjoe 's talk 20:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep as a subarticle. This has also served as a merge target for numerous terms that fall short of needing their own article such as bleg. Clean up and source. --Dhartung | Talk 22:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm with User:Dhartung. Italiavivi 19:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP. Considering how widely blogs are used in today's world, the information in this article is definitely notable and encyclopedic. It could be integrated into the Blog article, but that article is already pretty long. Keeping this as a separate sub-article, wikilinked from Blog as it now is, is reasonable and prudent and in agreement with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Truthanado 18:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.