Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books about Albanian terrorism in 2001 in Macedonia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Insurgency in the Republic of Macedonia. j⚛e deckertalk 17:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

List of books about Albanian terrorism in 2001 in Macedonia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, seems like WP:LISTCRUFT. Why Albanian terrorists? Why in Macedonia? Why only in 2001? Can see no evidence that the subject of books about Albanian terrorism in 2001 in Macedonia has received any real coverage as an independent subject. Fenix down (talk) 13:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The list's intro makes it clear the target topic is a particular historic event, the Insurgency in the Republic of Macedonia, which explains the focus. But that leaves the use of "terrorism" POV, and it also gives an obvious merge target for this short list, possibly in a further reading section for any works that are not already cited therein. I wouldn't think we'd want to list any works that are not either notable or reliable sources, so that may trim it down further. postdlf (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * But why are the books on the insurgency notable in themselves to the point they require a list? Fenix down (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * They don't need to be notable to be listed in a further reading section. postdlf (talk) 15:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I think they do when the further reading section is its own article. Fenix down (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you not notice the words "merge target" in my comment above? postdlf (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested. This is why articles have a further reading section (or whatever). Note that article author is making themselves busy creating stub articles for these books.TheLongTone (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - List cruft at best, a POV exercise more likely. Carrite (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:25, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge. Seems like not notable enough for standalone list. Canuckle (talk) 05:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge. It looks as if the purpose of this list was to unleash the T-word. It doesn't even look like a subtopic of the main article, but I'm giving it a benefit of doubt. GregorB (talk) 16:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.