Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books about kites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only "keep" argument is "Enough blue links to make it a valid list", but none of our inclusion criteria for lists depend on the number of blue links in them.  Sandstein  19:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

List of books about kites

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable topic for a list and is too broad for a Wikipedia list. Gabe114 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Lists. Gabe114 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just for people's consideration on prior discussions: This page was deprodded in 2011 by, which lead to the discussion in Talk:List of books about kites. Additional pings to those previously involved: , , . - 2pou (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete One can search for thousands of books on any arbitrary concept in any library's card catalogue or Google Books. Wikipedia is not the place to compile mere titles and authors with no inclusion criteria for such non-notable titles or explanation why they go here. Kite and related articles also covered in this list like Paragliding or Airborne wind energy could have further reading sections for relevant books not already cited, and Kite could incorporate List_of_books_about_kites, but there is no use for this sort of indiscriminate or overly broad stand-alone page. Reywas92Talk 18:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Couldn't this just be served by a category along the lines of Category:Kites in fiction? That would have the extra benefit of allowing other forms of media to be added. There wouldn't be many pages on the list since it would have to play a major part in the work in question, but it could be a potential solution. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I see there's already the category Category:Books about kite flying and Category:Works about kite flying, so a new category is unnecessary. I think these categories are really all we need. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm fairly certain Kites in fiction would be a viable article, and the categories are useful for navigation. I don't see how the list is in any viable, given how common the image is; I found no evidence that the list is notable in any way. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough blue links to make it a valid list, just remove the majority of entries which are not notable.  D r e a m Focus  15:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I fixed it. 13 valid entries, most with links to their own articles, some just linking to a notable writer.   D r e a m Focus  15:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There are a million topics that novels or picture books, including notable ones, may include as a subject or theme, but that doesn't mean there needs to be an article listing them without context because blue links exist. There's Kite that could include a few but this page doesn't seem warranted even with the non-notable books removed. Reywas92Talk 17:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: As mentioned above, this could easily become a category (e.g., Category:Fictional books about kites) or prose-ified to add particularly notable entries to Kites. Unfortunately, I also did a gander at the sources and none of them support the list's actual content (at least the new, edited version). I see this article ending up like Articles for deletion/List of cookbooks. Why? I Ask (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * perhaps WP:DAFT? Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.