Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breast reduction recipients


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Runcorn 20:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

List of breast reduction recipients

 * — (View AfD)

Has been sitting without any references since July. List definition of notable women is pretty vague. Pleclech 18:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, turn into a category. Just H 18:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a noteworthy subject and is easy to provide references for (which has been done).  "Notable" means they're notable enough to have wikipedia articles. --David Hain 09:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Good work with the referencing - its complete non-existence was my main concern with this article Pleclech 06:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. verifiable & peculiar, cerftainly more notable than List of people with breast implants Mukadderat 18:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete Can't say i agree, This should only apply to public figures whose breasts are in some way notable, and I suspect that's more likely with implants. DGG 03:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Everything's backed by citations. Quite studiously done, actually. A remarkable and strange little list. And they are women who already have WP articles so how can one claim they're non-notable? Shawn in Montreal 17:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.