Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of building materials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy close blah blah blah what does it take to get a damn article cleaned up anymore. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

List of building materials

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Confused list, overly vague definition. Contains huge numbers of redlinks, unlikely to be improved. Spam magnet. Deprodded in bad faith by a user who suspected that I was prodding just to prod. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – This topic passes WP:LISTN, because this information has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Among the numerous sources available online, some examples include: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:14, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Northamerica1000 and cleanup. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * So do you plan to clean it up, or is it just going to continue gathering cobwebs until Armageddon? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Information.svg Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep TPH seems to be suggesting that this page be deleted because it contained redlinks; redlinks such as building safety and ornamental woodwork!?! Northamerica1000 seems to have fixed these up quite quickly by ordinary editing &mdash; bravo!  And Northamerica1000 has listed numerous sources which demonstrate the notability and clarity of the topic &mdash; encore!  Warden (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. "Contains red links"?  "Unlikely to be improved"?  Accusations of bad faith in an AfD nom?  And just above, an attempt to use AfD to coerce someone else to clean up?  Oh, please.— S Marshall  T/C 22:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.