Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Huntingdon, St Ives and St Neots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

List of bus routes in Huntingdon, St Ives and St Neots

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:N, WP:V as it has no secondary sources. Fails WP:NOTDIR. Non of the routes listed have any notability. This is not a likely search term for a redirect and the target page would itself be non-notable. Charles (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Blah blah blah. Did you not notice someone removed the refs?! Adam mugliston  Talk  21:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Every time we have an AfD on a list of bus routes page it ALWAYS goes to non-consensus, so what is the point? It's good enough to stay. Adam mugliston  Talk  21:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean like Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Ely (2nd nomination)? "Always" is a very strong word. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I was mainly referring to pages I created. Ely was done badly by Wilbysuffolk and I'm not surprised. Adam mugliston  Talk  17:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom - This is purely a directory with no notability. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Stuart.Jamieson, while a helpful directory perhaps, its not notable enough for inclusion here. — GabeMc (talk) 23:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete them All. Seriously, what the hell? There are a dozen pages on these bus routes. Who's going to Wikipedia for a bus schedule? Unless Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated on one of these routes, these pages need to be deleted. -- NINTENDUDE 64 01:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and all delete recommendations above. Wikipedia is not well suited to serve as a directory of bus routes; if someone is looking for a bus route, they would be much better off looking at the bus operating company/transit authority's official web site, which presumably is kept up to date and is extremely unlikely to have been vandalized -- something which cannot necessarily be said about a Wikipedia page such as this one. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A page I created has never been vandalised. Except for when Charlesdrakew deleted sources from a different page I created.  Adam mugliston  Talk  17:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Removing references isn't always vandalism. A user like Charles usually only does things within policy.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  10:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Many list of bus routes pages have been nominated in this region as they are just not notable and will be deleted. One reference is not good enough and wikipedia is not a travel guide. Who would go on to wikipedia to see this rubbish. The recently deleted pages inculde: List of bus routes in Harleston, List of bus routes in Ely and List of bus routes in Stowmarket & Needham Market which have all had a large amount of delete responses and nearly no keeps. 81.145.108.189 (talk) 17:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge This content is all ready covered by List of bus routes in Cambridgeshire anyway. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Wilbysuffolk   Talk to me  18:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Gotta agree on this one. Delete or Merge.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  10:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - really obvious I'm afraid. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.