Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Needham Market


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

List of bus routes in Needham Market

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject: content would be better added to settlements in question. Wikipedia is not a directory of bus services, and the information is liable to become out of date. TheLongTone (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relevant here is Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Stowmarket & Needham Market (2nd nomination).   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 01:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete but do not add to the settlement article as it fails WP:NOT.--Charles (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Content in article is too specific for settlement article, but the public transport links of a place are quite important in rural EnglandTheLongTone (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * We usually say which companies provide services and leave people to go to the company websites for info. We are not here to advertise such services.--Charles (talk) 11:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. A guide to current bus routes belongs in a travel guide, not an encyclopedia. Should we decide that details of bus routes are of encyclopedic interest, then past bus routes would be just as relevant as current ones. --Michig (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No independent sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for above reasons and because we cannot guarantee that the creator will maintyain the article in perpetuity. ON the other hand we can be fairly sure that the bus operators or the Passenger Transport Executive for the area will do so on their own website.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikivoyage where there is no requirement to be encyclopaedic, or notable and scope is on useful travel information. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 08:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.