Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of busiest railway stations in Andhra Pradesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

List of busiest railway stations in Andhra Pradesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There list is currently entirely original research, because there are no sources ranking these railway stations. The rankings currently seem to be based on the number of trains that visit each, taken from a primary source; therefore, there is no way to be sure that other stations with more traffic do not exist.

Additionally, there is no indication that the topic of this list is notable. List of railway stations in Andhra Pradesh might just be notable, but would be redundant with List of railway stations in India. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nomination. Wikipedia is not a repository for variations of lists of things. So, as it can be considered redundant, this OR article should go.  Rcsprinter123    (sing)  00:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Clearly WP:OR.  There are no sources to establish that this is a notable list, only that these railway stations exist.  Msnicki (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:OR.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   15:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and above. We could possibly create a category for these rather than an article. Nordic Dragon talk 08:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.