Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of business schools in Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no clear consensus. --Ezeu 06:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

List of business schools in Canada
Listing per consensus at Education WikiProject. Maintaining this list is error-prone, and archaic, and stale. Wikipedia is not a junkyard. Delete Ardenn  16:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted, this is duplicated by Category:Business schools in Canada. Ardenn  17:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per my reasons for deletion of List of law schools in Canada, above. Agent 86 17:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, the category is fine. --Coredesat talk 22:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * keep as per my reasons in the article above. Jcuk 23:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is nothing more than listcruft.  The category does this better by not needing human maintenance of a separate article.  GRBerry 01:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Assuming these issue some sort of standard accreditation or degree (I am not familiar with Canadian tertiary education), information is readily available and they are notable. SM247 04:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The notability of the items on the list is not in question. --Coredesat talk 05:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Categorise. -- GWO
 * Comment. If the list is deleted, the few red links should be first converted to a stub.  With that done, you could argue that this article is a duplicate of the category.  But for now it is not a duplicate.  Vegaswikian 06:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete list cruft for sure. --Bombycil 04:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep for now, agree wih Vegaswikian's above comment. Automatically convert my vote into Delete when if is done. --WinHunter (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please this is useful not listcruft and not a category duplicate Yuckfoo 21:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.