Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of candies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core des at 04:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

List of candies
Contested prod. Unmaintainable list with arbritary definitions (why only some mints and who decides what is gourmet) Nuttah68 10:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a list. Pointless and arbitrary. No descriptive content either. BTLizard 10:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. SuperDT 10:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:OR and pretty pointless, apparently. Cheers -- Imo  eng  11:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmaintainable, POV/OR list.-- Hús  ö  nd  15:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 18:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Just another list. Very arbitrary.  Article only gives information on what will NOT be listed.  Seems very USA-centric (and not just from use of word 'candies'). Any list that does not include every possible entry is useless.  Things like "List of the United States" or "List of Nobel Peace Prize Winners" can be defined and complete.  This cannot.   Emeraude 18:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unmaintainably large if fully expanded, and a category would work just as well while being self-maintaining. If it were being used for some sort of candy Wikiproject as a list of articles to write then it should have been placed in the Wikipedia namespace, but I do not see any such claim in the article. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 20:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Cleanup, see Talk:list of candies. -- User:Docu
 * Cleanup, it has potential, perhaps add catergories? Armanalp 20:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Cleanup, I agree with Armanalp.  Drahcir  my talk 02:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 02:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.