Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of capital cities in the history of Vojvodina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Clear consensus that the content appears to be original research given the lack of reliable sourcing. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

List of capital cities in the history of Vojvodina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Awkward article; Vojvodina is not a country, but a province. See Category:Lists of capitals, which includes countries, but no country subdivisions (this is the only one). Z oupan 13:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - strange article, maybe made in error. Should be deleted -- Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  00:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Original research, by WP standards WP:OR. It takes a geographical area and lists cities within it that have been the capital of some state or political subdivision from Roman Times up until World War Two. No evidence that anyone else had ever put this information together. Borock (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This does not strike me as a useful list. Certainly fails WP:OR, particularly as some of them are capitals of other polities of which Vojvodina was then part.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete --- Very interesting. I didnt know this and have not seen it anywhere else. Still I also say delete for thesame reassons as those above me already said.Stepojevac (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.