Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cargo airlines of Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

List of cargo airlines of Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page doesn't have any source. Same can be found List of airlines of Bangladesh. So, its better delete the page and leave a redirect. Sony R (talk) 07:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Sony R (talk) 07:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Pointless duplication of material already contained in List of airlines of Bangladesh. Doesn't add anything new and there are only four entries so the length of the list isn't an issue. Neiltonks (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to List of airlines of Bangladesh. Unnecessary article and there are no other List of cargo airlines of .. articles to give this type of list article any precedent. Ajf773 (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete While I would usually include "redirect per WP:CHEAP" on situations like this, it has come to my attention that there is no other "List of cargo airlines of [country]." The article is an inferior duplicate to the regular airline list. AmericanAir88(talk) 03:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect (or "merge") is outcome supported by statements here so far. Outright deletion would just to be mean, perhaps, or to run up someone's deletion score?  And allow restoration later if more info is developed, without basically violating Wikipedia's principles towards giving credit, preserving attribution, etc.  Consider some of reasoning in fine essay wp:TNTTNT. --Doncram (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.