Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cars available in pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

List of cars available in pakistan

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I don't think it will be possible to list every single car that is available in Pakistan. Also, I do not think that such a list meets Wikipedia's standards for notability. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--res Laozi speak  15:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notabile, non verifiable. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for the whole "not really possible" thing. Perhaps somebody should also AfD List of cars available in India? NotARealWord (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Done. Divebomb is not British 15:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Aside from the fact that this is an unmaintainable list, this is a terrible, terrible article. Divebomb is not British 14:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced, ill-defined & unmaintainable. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 15:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced triva, and unverifiable - what makes a car "available"? And it's not even of sufficient quality to keep as a stub. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That comment was hasty and confusing - it does define what it means by "available", but it isn't developed into even the start of a decent list article yet. If someone can actually turn it into a proper list, that would be great, but if not then I don't think it's really worth keeping as it stands. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.