Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cat haters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:06, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

List of cat haters
The article itself mentions that several of the entries are based purely on popular hearsay. Non-comprehensive, and non-encylopedic. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 18:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into ailurophobiacs, then delete. Youngamerican 19:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-encyclopedic. --Aurochs
 * Delete, hardly verifiable. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 19:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete Unmaintainable list. Of at best dubious encyclopedic value. No sources, and hard to verify. if it inclkuded only notable people with verifable hatrad or fear of cats, adn cited sources, might be reasoanble, but even then, what is the point? DES (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons above. PJM 20:17, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dubious and unneeded. Punkmorten 21:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Worthy of preserving, but not worthy of an article. -Silence 22:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I advice you to put it somewhere on your user page. Punkmorten 22:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * My user page is too crowded already. Come on, how could anyone not be amused by "Rockwell Sayre, a Chicago banker in the early 1920's, started a campaign to rid the entire world of cats by the year 1925. He offered financial rewards to cat killers."? -Silence 23:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * You do know about Subpages, right? - Mgm|(talk) 08:34, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic and just plain silly. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic and unverifiable. Jtmichcock 03:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of miserable gits Delete. I actually quite enjoyed the article, but it's unverifiable and doesn't belong in encyclopaedic namespace. --Last Malthusian 09:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless, in the interests of NPOV, somone produces a verified (and comprehensive) list of ''Cats Who Hate People" --SockpuppetSamuelson 15:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Surely such a list would be unmaintainably large. -Silence 18:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --JJay 01:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. pointless and unverifiable. UkPaolo 14:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: pointless, inherently POV listcruft. MCB 22:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Animacruft. --Nintendude 03:30, 19 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.