Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities who have worn dreadlocks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

List of celebrities who have worn dreadlocks
Is this article fit for an encyclopedia? Doesn't it qualify as listcruft? Ethii 06:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hairy delete per nom. RandyWang ( raves/rants ) 06:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, untangle that cruft and cut it loose. Wikipedia is not for lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. -- H·G (words/works) 07:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., unmaintable list of non notable information. Rob 09:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --DarkAudit 12:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per DarkAudit. Alphachimp  talk  14:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete lsitcruft; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information  hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 15:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per footballers with moustaches   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  17:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. -- Wine Guy  Talk  22:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic. This list is too subjective: who's a celebrity, how long do they have to wear dreadlocks to qualify, etc. Too subjective to appear in an encyclopedia. Scorpiondollprincess 18:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.