Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities with breast implants

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. --Allen3 talk 21:21, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

List of celebrities with breast implants
Largely unverifiable trivia. tregoweth 19:48, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * The only problem I see is the speculation. This should be removed. I suggest Keeping any celebrities who have publicly confirmed or denied having breast implants. Pburka 20:51, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Excuse me? You probably did not mean that but the sentence comes out as if the denial would mean confirmation - Skysmith 10:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless the "rumored" section is eliminated.BillyCreamCorn 21:00, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The rumour section seems to have gone but we are still listing those 'either self-admittedly or with high probability' - that's nonverifiable and encourages OR (mind boggles?) - so delete unless someone is willing to reduce this to verifiable --Doc (?) 21:42, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; semi-speculative. The bottom section should probably be on a different page or moved to a breast implant page. &mdash; RJH 21:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * keep Excellent content, but needs to be sourced. lots of issues  | leave me a message 22:56, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable topic. Kappa 00:03, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa CanadianCaesar 00:14, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unmaintainable, unverifiable. Pavel Vozenilek 02:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unmaintainalbe, unverifiable. Pointless and non-encyclopedic as well. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. But rename it to List of people with breast implants (including only notable people of course). It would be better. --Edcolins 10:32, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Idiotic, completely non-encyclopedic topic. Unverifiable.→Encephalon | &zeta; | &sum; 12:33:16, 2005-08-07 (UTC)
 * Delete per Aardvark. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 13:14, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The addition of those who have denied and spoken out against implants adds legitimacy to the topic. It should be expanded (no pun intended) with some introductory material to make it more of an article than just a category-in-disguise. Speculative information should be removed and a criteria should be established for inclusion otherwise 99% of porn stars could be listed. 23skidoo 14:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, half of this list is speculation and the rest is unencyclopedic.Gateman1997 16:32, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep encyclopedic list.  Grue   19:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, enecyclopedic list -user:Fallout_boy
 * Delete, highly speculative list.--nixie 22:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not unverifiable in principle. Needs references and discussion of criteria. --Tony Sidaway Talk  19:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Shouldn't the latter two sections be deleted even if the article is kept? After all it's a list of people with implants, not a list of people the tabloids suspect of having them or people who don't have them.Gateman1997 00:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, some of the material doesn't really belong. It should be removed. --Tony Sidaway Talk 00:48, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete since we cannot know for sure who had this done or not. Even if some do come out and say that they got it done, many others are just pure speculation, which could fall under Original research. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 00:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Since when did every piece of information on Wikipedia need to be supported by an external website? In most cases general consensus is sufficient. 80.203.101.87 11:48, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.