Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrity women who took their husbands' names in marriage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  22:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

List of celebrity women who took their husbands' names in marriage
PROD tag removed. Unencyclopedic listcruft. While the phenomenon may be less common than previously, that does not mean it is particularly notable. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; delete. MCB 20:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Honestly, who gives a damn? Aplomado - UTC 21:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as indiscriminate list. Slowmover 22:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, cruft. Pavel Vozenilek 23:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Listcruft at its worst. --BWD(talk) 23:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as pointless listcruft, and because the author's so clueless he thinks some of these women were born three times. Fan1967 23:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Here's the definition of nee, you moron: 1 -- used to identify a woman by her maiden family name 2 : originally or formerly called. The second definition applies.  You are ten times more pointless than this list. -- Gerkinstock 15:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Aplomado T. --Phroziac ♥♥♥♥ 23:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. The inverse list would be marginally better, but still no good. -- Mithent 23:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination.--Isotope23 01:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete CalJW 03:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. --Ter e nce Ong 05:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The inverse list would be far more maintainable, but who would go looking for that, let alone this? Grandmasterka 06:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete llllllllLLLLLLLISTCRUFT!  Dei z io  13:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --HappyCamper 13:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good factual list of unusual phenomenon. Would love to see it expanded.-- JJay 03:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.