Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters based on developers in Ultima series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

List of characters based on developers in Ultima series

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is completely original research that I have been unable to verify even 1 statement with a reliable source. じん ない  04:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for many reasons. First, apart from the well-known Garriott = Lord British, it is entirely original research and fan speculation. Secondly, lots of game companies will base characters on people they know just for shits and giggles, so who cares? Thirdly, this is an indiscriminate list not suitable for an encyclopedia. Reyk  YO!  04:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Lord Blackthorne is also pretty well known since UO, but aside from that, fully second all points. MLauba (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete crufty OR  Chzz  ►  15:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Per Chzz. I do suspect the sources for a few of these are out there, but you'd really have to dig, and then that would essentially be trivial content, which is usually avoided in articles. --Izno (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or Transwiki, no RS, reeks of OR, and per Reyk. MLauba (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all cruft. The war on cruft never ends.--Sloane (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable/OR. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.