Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters from Beverly Hills Chihuahua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

List of characters from Beverly Hills Chihuahua

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Completely unsourced and makes no real claim for why this should be a stand-alone list and not just have the major characters in the film article. Staxringold talkcontribs 15:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as this list topic or a definition for this list appears to have not been published anywhere else other than Wikipedia, as it does not have a verifiable definition and contravenes the prohibition on original research as illustrated by WP:MADEUP. If it has not be been published anywhere else, and there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable list topic, then there is no rationale for inclusion. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own whim, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with content policy. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mike Cline (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete or smerge. Films with one-time characters don't need a separate character list - the characters can be covered in the main article just fine. In this case though, I wouldn't mind seeing the descriptions of the main characters moved over to the main article. Just don't keep a separate article/list. – sgeureka t•c 16:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete a brief summary of characters in the main article makes sense, but this is huge and overly-detailed, with a lot of material extremely unlikely to be covered in independent reliable sources (there's even a whole section for characters who only appeared in the deleted scenes!) Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete None of these characters have any impact in the wider popular culture. Joal Beal (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.