Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Dominic Deegan: Oracle for Hire (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per withdrawn nomination and lack of delete preferences (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 19:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

List of characters in Dominic Deegan: Oracle for Hire
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is being used by the webmaster of the comic as a webpage supplement to the comic (http://www.dominic-deegan.com links directly to the article), in violation of WP:NOT. Article also fails to assert real-world notability WP:N, and is in violation of WP:INDISCRIMINATE as well. McJeff (talk) 00:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.   —McJeff (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Neutral: I dunno. This is a webcomic that's cracked the top twenty in readership by some measures .  Is this list any more inappropriate than the many similar character lists for other fictional works?    RGTraynor  16:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral: Merge with Dominic Deegan: Oracle for Hire. Of the nominators criteria IMO only WP:N warrants an Afd although I have some sympathy with the WP:INDISCRIMINATE claim. Article can be cleaned up, but I can't find any decent references, hence merge it. ChessCreator (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - if we can get a couple good sources, I'd be happy to withdraw the nomination. McJeff (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * WITHDRAW NOMINATION: It seems to me there is no consensus for deletion, and a merge won't solve any of the problems the article has.  It's still a mess but I think it's more important to improve it.  I also think that WP:FICT may justify keeping the article. McJeff (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.