Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of churches in Tulsa, Oklahoma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 00:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

List of churches in Tulsa, Oklahoma

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information --Ichabod (talk) 02:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note This AfD is part of a series of AfDs made by the nominator that specifically targets lists of churches across the United States. The AfDs currently include this, this and this. • Freechild   'sup?   15:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per the nom and WP:NOT. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete just a directory. JJL (talk) 03:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a needed directory; thats what yellowpages.com is for. • Lawrence Cohen  05:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for more policy reasons than I care to countBalloonman (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. Punkmorten (talk) 09:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hammer1980 ·talk 11:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per all above, someone should hunt down any other lists of churches in Somewhere, USA. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 22:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomFrank Anchor (talk) 01:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an arbitrary list that adds no encyclopedic content, as is this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.•  Freechild   'sup?   15:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does exactly what it says on the tin, and we are not the Yellow Pages. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - this is a substantial compilation with many links to websites. I note that the list for Fort Wayne has been kept (though only due to no consensus), in which case other substantial lists should follow the same course.  It would however be better if there were rather more text.  Is not Tulsa not home to the "name it and claim it" vieww of prayer, if so there ought to be a link to soemthing on that.  I regard the form of this page as less satisfactory than that for Edmonton.  Peterkingiron (talk) 09:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.