Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities producing the most NBA players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

List of cities producing the most NBA players

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

List that easily falls under WP:NOT, having basketball players coming out of a certain city is unmaintainable, and doesn't really make either the player or the city notable because of that, violates WP:LISTCRUFT, especially 1, 2, 3, and 8 Delete Secret account 13:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 13:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  14:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - the list is eminently maintainable - such information is consistently available for NBA players on statistical databases and can easily be added to as new players make NBA debuts. matt91486 (talk) 18:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying that this list isn't maintainable or avaliable, it's just too narrow of a list, we don't have List of politcians by city for a reason. Even a category would be deleted as WP:OVERCAT, why should an article stay. Secret account 19:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--this strikes me as pure listcruft. Drmies (talk) 00:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete calculating such a list based on existing stats would constitute original research and the city someone lives in has no direct link to their basketball skills. I'd support a list of basketball teams or basketball academies producing the most NBA players, because those are actually linked. - Mgm|(talk) 08:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete a mammoth wall of text with no real significance. Hazir (talk) 04:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.