Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of coaches who have coached 200 NRL games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

List of coaches who have coached 200 NRL games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was PROD'd by User:Schwede66 with the rationale: Listcruft that does not meet WP:GNG - I feel there could be some weight in this argument but I also feel there is a chance this could be expanded into a perfectly valid list article, so while I'm personally on the fence a bit, I think it'd be a good idea to see what the project/community consensus is on deletion rather than it simply falling foul of an expired PROD. Skemcraig (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the above, if someone is willing to put a few sentences in then it would be of much more value. Not sure if it is a significant milestone for a coach though.Fleets (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete (for now at least): it seems to be original research. If 200 games is a particular significant milestone then I would expect to see links to sources that discuss this and host their own lists of coaches who have reached the milestone. Mattlore (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete If anyone was willing to improve the article, I could see some value in redirecting this to a more general title such as List of NRL coaches. As it stands, the 200 games is a bit of an arbitrary milestone, and should be deleted per WP:LISTCRUFT. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, agreed with the above that if 200 games were considered an important milestone for coaching then there'd be lots of non-routine coverage of it when someone passes that point. But there isn't.  At this point it's indiscriminate information.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC).


 * Delete as above. there is no indication that coaching 200 games is a significant milestone... it's not like when a player reaches 300 games which gets well documented. LibStar (talk) 02:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.