Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of collective nouns by collective term (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Please take any Transwiki discussions to the appropriate talk page. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

List of collective nouns by collective term
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Links to pages of lists of collective nouns. No real need for disambiguation here. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 13:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. Will (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary- that's what it is there for Lurker  (said · done) 17:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per my reasoning at Articles for deletion/List of collective nouns by subject I-Z. --Fang Aili talk 14:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps the nom hasn;t notice, but wiktionary does not include such lists, just individual terms. DGG (talk) 08:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an annotated list of closely-related words, otherwise known as a "glossary", as permitted by the stand-alone list guideline. Strong keep if Wiktionary does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who have contributed to all of the collective nouns lists since 2001, most of whom are not being heard from in these discussions. DHowell 03:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per DHowell. Mathmo Talk 23:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.