Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of collective nouns for reptiles and amphibians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Please take any Transwiki discussions to the appropriate talk page. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

List of collective nouns for reptiles and amphibians

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

List of collective noun definitions. Lacking sources. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 13:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki those that can be sourced to Wiktionary. Delete the rest. Will (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per my reasoning at Articles for deletion/List of collective nouns by subject I-Z. First human edit was in 2003. --Fang Aili talk 14:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps the nom hasn't noticed, but wiktionary does not include such lists, just individual terms. And Exaltation of Larks is the source for notabiity of the topic--it includes living things in general, including these animals Lists are being nom.  without much concern foir what they contain or their purpose, using only the most general of arguments. DGG (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an annotated list of closely-related words, otherwise known as a "glossary", as permitted by the stand-alone list guideline. Strong keep if Wiktionary does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who have contributed to all of the collective nouns lists since 2001, most of whom are not being heard from in these discussions. DHowell 03:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep YOu got to love a page called List of collective nouns for reptiles and amphibians!!!
 * Strong Keep per DHowell. Mathmo Talk 23:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.