Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. It appears unlikely for this to reach any other result without a better articulated reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) Reywas92Talk 19:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

List of common misconceptions
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Some editors on Chinese Wikipedia (user:SunAfterRain, user:T45614631, user:Newbamboo) believe that the inclusion criteria for this article is unclear and the definition of "common" is unclear.So I think English Wikipedia also needs to discuss whether this article should keep or delete. 日期20220626 (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC) 日期20220626 (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 14:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. This is enwiki, not zhwiki. zhwiki issues should be addressed on zhwiki, not enwiki. Kinopiko  talk 14:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Procedural speedy keep. No valid reason has been given for nomination. There is no mention of any policy that the article might be contravening. There is a list of inclusion criteria on the Talk page which seem reasonable to me, so there is no way that a claim that this is an indiscriminate list can prevail. Any ambiguity concerning the inclusion criteria, or any issues with any of the existing entries, can be discussed on the Talk page. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, that's a bizzare idea to bring Chinese wiki editor's discussion as a rationale for deletion of any article in en wiki. Artem.G (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Check the talk page, there a note up top for the Inclusion Criteria.  D r e a m Focus  15:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Unclear on why concerns of three editors of the Chinese Wikipedia is justification to delete the English Wiki's article. Mr Fink (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep The reason behind the deletion is invalid in my opinion. I think this article is very valuable, because it debunks many misconceptions that unfortunately are very frequent. JagodowyLis (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep because no valid deletion rationale has been provided. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, the inclusion criteria are pretty much as clear as they could be (of course, we can discuss changing them if anyone has a proposal), and problems with the fuzziness of the definition of "common" or of anything else are dealt with, as is normal on Wikipedia, by referring to reliable sources. W. P. Uzer (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.