Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of companies that make organic foods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

List of companies that make organic foods

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Even though I think this one's indefensible, I haven't bothered with prodding it since someone's bound to contest it. At the moment, this article is a uselessly short list, which if left will grow like a magic bean into an unmanageably long one. Since virtually every food company on the planet has an organic division, this is basically a List of all major food companies, most of the medium sized ones and quite a few of the smaller ones. And if the basic food groups are really Soup, Cereal and Chips, as this article seems to imply, I think we may have located the flaw in the whole healthy eating concept -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  00:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as massively indiscriminate, as outlined in the nom. --Haemo 00:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. Extranet (Talk 00:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-21 01:16Z 
 * Delete per nom. A list that can never be finished and will end up unbelievably long... what can I say :) --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 01:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. John Vandenberg 02:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tim Q. Wells 02:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Having this information in list form isn't particularly encyclopedic. The articles on the companies can include this information in context.--Xnuala (talk) 03:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good grief. Per nom, who argues this well. -- Charlene 05:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Impossible to maintain in a sufficiently comprehensive form to be worthwhile - and if it were possible the list would be infeasibly long. BTLizard 09:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Adambro 11:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Inevitably it will grow into an unmanageably large list.  ~  Mag nus   an im um    (aka Steptrip) 16:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - so that's where I'm going wrong in my diet! Cricketgirl 23:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Add "Diet Coke" to that list, and it pretty much sums up my diet -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  23:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Me thinks this is snowballed. Sr13 (T|C) 02:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.