Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of composers by age


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

List of composers by age

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY: a nice project, but not suitable for an encyclopaedia. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 21:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Lists of people.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is one rare example of where categories (e.g., Composers born in 1954 or whatnot) would serve the project better, but even then, I question the need for such specificity (categories for individual centuries already exist). As it stands, this is an overwhelmingly large scope for a list on Wikipedia, and one that is ultimately not needed. Why? I Ask (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NLIST. This is a weird one. Other than possibly those who died far too young (I'm looking at you, Wolfgang), how long a composer (or politician, musician, businessperson, etc.) lived is not a suitable basis for a list. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact this includes living composers makes the concept untenable. Not only do living composers need constantly updated, what is the criteria for adding a new composer coming into public awareness? This idea might work if listed only dead composers and was titled "Age of Composers at Death" or something similar..but is such a thing really necessary? ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NLIST. Beyond that particular policy, it's tough to find any specific violations but this list simply isn't sustainable or useful for an encyclopedia. I agree with the other voters above on how it just doesn't work. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 02:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.