Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of compositions by Matthew de Lacey Davidson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

List of compositions by Matthew de Lacey Davidson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Created by subject. AfD in tandem with subject article. Source is primary generated. Linked pages are also created by subject and need AfD. No notable performances or reviews. Maineartists (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete List is subject-generated; primary. Works have either had no actual performance; or have not been substantially reviewed by notable, reliable sources. Subject editor also has started to create pages: The Singing Lesson, Quartetto dell'Arte, Symphony No. 1 in 20 keys ("Letter to the World") which should be placed for WP:SPEEDY due to no performance or substantial review. WP:NORESUMES Maineartists (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think those would qualify for A9, which is specifically about musical recordings. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 04:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Lists. Shellwood (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a featured list; the composer is also up for AfD, he isn't notable, neither is this. Oaktree b (talk) 23:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article seems to be part of a WP:WALLEDGARDEN of articles about Matthew de Lacey Davidson created by a connected editor. The composer and his compositions do not meet our criteria for inclusion as notable subjects. It appears that the suite of articles exist to solely to promote the work of the composer. WP:ADMASQ states that it defeats the purpose of the encyclopedia to use it as public relations or promotion for an individual or a company. This and the other articles listed above by should not be retained in the encyclopedia. Netherzone (talk) 12:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Bearian (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.