Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer animated films (United States)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

List of computer animated films (United States)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary fork from the superior List of computer-animated films which can already be sorted by country, so no merging is necessary (the information in this list exists in List of computer-animated films). According to the talk page, this list was created when an editor couldn't get consensus for his proposed changes, so he created this redundant fork instead. Masaruemoto 01:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Looking through the talk page and article history, I don't see any suggestion that Cnota was acting in bad faith, and in some ways I prefer the layout of this article to the other, but we really shouldn't have fully-redundant lists like this.  --Hyperbole 02:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There was no suggestion the creator acted in bad faith, I was just paraphrasing what another editor told me. These are his exact words; "(Cnota's) ideas to make this page complicated and unwieldy were rejected by the other editors... he apparently decided to create a new page of his own". Masaruemoto 02:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. The list is redundant. – Mike . lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 03:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant. Doczilla 03:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because it's redundant to a better article Mandsford 12:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to List of computer-animated films. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 14:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete—would it be redundant for me to say that this is redundant? &mdash; dust mite  16:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.